Thursday, 23 February 2012

‘Greece sliding towards third-world status’

‘Greece sliding towards third-world status’
Published: 20 February, 2012, 21:13
Greece needs a greater rescue package than the one being negotiated in Brussels, says economist Johan van Overtveldt. In fact, the new bailout should be worth at least as much as the entire Greek economy.
­As eurozone finance ministers meet in Brussels to decide if Greece has done enough to get an additional 130-billion euro financial aid package, Overtveldt told RT that Greece actually needs around 170 billion euros to make it through the next few years.
On top of that, he says, Greece needs an additional 35 billion euros to recapitalize its banks.
“So we are talking now about a package that in reality is about 200 billion euros, which happens to be exactly the amount equal to Greek gross domestic product,” he explained.
But even a bigger aid package will not pull the Greek economy out of a deep recession, Overtveldt believes.



“The negative spiral in which the Greek economy and Greek society have been imprisoned for almost two years will only get worse,” he explained. “The austerity program that is imposed on the country will worsen the recession, which in its turn will worsen the budget outlook.”
Overtveldt says what Greece really needs at the moment is a growth perspective for its economy – which can be achieved only by exiting the eurozone.
“It will lead, of course, to a devaluation of the new drachma but that is exactly what is needed to get the economy growing again through international trade,” he concluded.
Over the last two years, Greece has seen a number of rallies and demonstrations that often escalate into clashes of angry and desperate people with the police. Last Saturday, the approval of a new austerity package was followed by a major clash with tear gas being used against some demonstrators. One person was injured and about 60 detained over the violence. 

­‘Greece sliding towards third-world status’

­What Greece really needs right now is a redevelopment plan – and the IMF is the best pick for for the job, economist Harlan Green told RT.
“Greece is sliding very quickly into being a third world country, and the IMF knows how to deal with third world countries,” the editor of PopularEconomics.com said. “In Greece’s case, they’ve lost productivity, they’ve lost what economists call aggregate demand, by just demanding austerity without a plan for recovery.”
Green says that productivity has fallen dramatically not only in Greece, but in Europe as a whole when compared with the US.
“Greeks themselves are very hard workers,” he added. “But it is very inefficient.”


Greece downgraded next to default level by Fitch
Published: 22 February, 2012, 17:32
Fitch has downgraded Greece to a pre - default level (Reuters / John Kolesidis)
TAGS: Crisis, Greece





Fitch rating agency wasn’t impressed by the EU leaders’ decision to grant a second bailout for Greece.It downgraded the country to pre-default level.
The sovereign long-term default rating of Greece now stands at the pre-default "С" level, down from "ССС".
The decision comes after the Eurogroup agreed on Tuesday it’ll release a second lifeline of 130 billion euro to Greece, with private creditors also writing off 53.5% of the country’s debt. Fitch says should private creditors complete a bond swap, the agency will have the grounds to announce a Greek default.
“The rating downgrade won’t influence the world markets dramatically, as they have already taken into consideration the unsteady Greek economy and its probable default. If markets demonstrate any reaction to the rating decrease, these will be short-term changes. Long-term trends might not change,” says Anna Bodrova from Investcafe.
However, the downgrade, which reflects existing doubts whether Greece will be able to solve longer term Greek debt problem, “sets a negative tone for other South European countries, like Portugal and Spain,” Dimitri Kryukov, a head of Russian office of Verno Investment Research, tells Business RT.


http://www.fxstreet.com/fundamental/market-view/currency-currents/2012/02/21/
So what?” he asked. “Things will only get worse. We have reached a point where we’re trying to figure out how to survive just the next day, let alone the next 10 days, the next month, the next year.”


           -Anastasis Chrisopoulos, Athens taxi driver (from Reuters)


130-billion-euro here, 130-billion-euro there, and pretty soon you have to start finding some growth!

One adage that seems to work as much as anything else, and why it is an adage I guess, is “buy the rumor and sell the news.” I won’t bore you with the behavioral aspects of why this works, I think you know. We are seeing it a bit this morning on display on news a Greek default has been averted: the euro is lower, and ditto for most Eurozone bonds since the announcement of a deal that gives Greece another 130-billion-euro it can pour down the rabbit hole with the rest of the money funneled in by Eurozone taxpayers.


Of course, sooner or later financial engineering reaches the limits of its public relations effect and there must be some underlying payoff from said engineering besides getting funds to follow banks chasing into periphery debt for a trade. It’s not that rising periphery bond prices, i.e. lower yields, isn’t helpful; it is. But even at current rate levels, it will be mighty hard for many countries to maintain austerity pledges; all attempts to do so will likely accentuate the trend we see in the chart below:

1

And of course, this chart is the mirror image of the domestic adjustments periphery countries have to make because they do not have a free-floating currency available to help them make these adjustments:

1

Thus, periphery economies desperately need some growth. Rising unemployment and tighter budgets will not produce revenues needed to pay debt; instead it produces a self-feeing vicious spiral downward. This view seems completely at odds with the Troika program even though the Greek economy provides them with live test case of abject failure stemming directly from the implementation of their own flawed theories.


And here is why it will likely get worse for Greece and other periphery countries whose growth is heading lower—the real economy will be starved.


We have already witnessed this economic/money/manipulation phenomenon in the US, from the WSJ this morning:


“The eight giant European banks that have disclosed their annual results in recent weeks reported holding a total of about $816 billion in cash and deposits at central banks as of Dec. 31. That is up 50% from a year earlier, when the same banks were holding roughly $543 billion.”


Does any of this sound familiar? You can lead a horse to water, in fact you can force-feed said horse with massive amounts of reserves, but you can’t make him lend any of it to the real economy where real people build real businesses and hire other real people who need real jobs.


Just in case you forgot just how tightly US banks have held on to their Fed sponsored reserves via the massively steep yield curve that impoverishes savers to subsidize bank healing, here is a look. This chart shows reserves in the US banking system ... hmmm ... three years and counting so far since Bernanke and Company decided this is the only viable strategy for the economy. Viable for financial assets, but the other side of the economy is still starved...

1

The point is, despite the new Greek rescue (I am losing count how many we have had so far), it appears the Eurozone, now clearly a two-track world with Germany bathing in credit and low rates and low unemployment (which adds to more angst and animosity toward Germans amongst the PIIGS), appears collectively heading into deeper recession.


One wonders if now, finally, EU leaders have run out of rabbits of financial engineering to pull from their hats. Financial engineering is a lot easier than real growth. If you don’t believe me, go ask Goldman; after all it is their fun and games that caused much of this Greek problem in the first place.

1

Friday, 17 February 2012

Pros and the Cons of Investing in Hedge Funds and an Overall Perspective of Raising Money


Radio Archive
RADIO SHOW
listen to to show
http://www.radio-shalom.ca/EN/player.php?URI=/../mp3/Programs/1042/1149.mp3


RICHARD WILSON AS OUR GUEST ,
WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 3RD  2010
LIVE AT 4PM EDT , 1pm Portland ,Oregon time

MONEY & BUSINESS WITH SAMUEL EZERZER
http://www.radio-shalom.ca/EN/showemission.php?ID=1042
link via live internet

INTRODUCTIONMONEY MONEY & BUSINESS

Pros and the Cons of Investing in Hedge Funds and an Overall Perspective of Raising Money

WHAT is it about hedge funds that are so fascinating ? Contrary to the popular belief that hedge funds are very volatile investment instruments, hedge funds actually have many advantages over traditional investment vehicles like bond and equity investments. Hedge funds can achieve positive gains regardless of market trends, and they can reduce overall portfolio risk. As such, investing in a hedge fund can be a good strategy if you want a more balanced portfolio. Studies have shown that hedge funds are more effective than traditional investment vehicles when it comes to minimizing risks as well as maximizing returns . Since hedge funds employ more sophisticated and diverse investment strategies and have a wider range of markets to invest in, hedge funds offer a lot more diversification than traditional investment options.
Many people and investors don’t really know what they do, other than pay themselves and their principals ridiculous amounts of money. When something goes wrong in the financial market weather it will be a market collapse ,a currency crisis, a housing collapse or a sovereign debt default—they are quick to be blamed, …..their shadowy character making them ideal scapegoats ,and big institutional investors and wealthy individuals will still throw money at them.
The biggest downside to hedge funds investing is the lack of readily available public information about hedge funds. Hedge funds need not register with the SEC. Thus, they are not subject to periodic reporting requirements. This means that ordinary investors who are interested in investing in hedge funds need to do a lot more work when researching a hedge fund than when checking out other registered investment instruments.
Hedge funds are the James Bonds of the marketplace. They play bigger games, take bigger risks, use unorthodox methods, and have the power to capture the public imagination in a way that their lesser counterparts have difficulty approaching. So why do investor flock to these hedge funds ? Is it just for higher returns ? Or are they tired and fed up with losing accounts and smooth talking brokers who are only accumulating their own pension fund!
On today's show we have live from Portland Oregon Mr Richard Wilson a hedge fund expert who will give us insight on the pros and the cons of investing in hedge funds and an overall perspective of raising money for hedge funds!!!

My name is Samuel Ezerzer thank you for tuning in to Money and Business on radio shalom CJRS 1650 AM in Montreal, the financial Capital of Canada...I am a Financial Consultant for T E Wealth , Financial Consultants specializing in financial planning , Investment Management , and retirement planning ,and if you have any questions on money and business show or please give me a call directly at 514 738 4100 ext 272 or you can visit our website at www.radio-shalom.ca and listen on live stream and check our archives. You may also email me with your questions or suggestions on today’s show at moneyandbusinessshow@gmail.com and I will reply to your questions, and if you need to have your financial analysis and planning please email me at sezerzer@temirador.com or contact information  www.tewealth.com







RICHARD WILSON from Portland Oregon is an expert in hedge fund marketing, capital raising and fund start-ups and has a following of 38,000 active members and you can read up on him at hedgefundgroup.org ,



Biography


Richard Wilson is head of the Hedge Fund Group (HFG) which now has over 38,000 active members and runs the #1 most popular certification and training program in the industry, the Certified Hedge Fund Professional (CHP) Designation Program. Richard is an expert in hedge fund marketing, capital raising, and fund start-ups and his firm provides services and assistance to funds within these areas. Most people on this call may know Richard from his blog HedgeFundBlogger.com but his other websites include HedgeFundGroup.org, and HedgeFundTraining.com.


questions

I have noted that there have been an influx of hedge funds start ups in recent years, Why in your opinion have there been so many start ups every week? And how would you describe a typical investors profile?

What is the hardest part about running a hedge fund?

How exactly does a hedge fund manager to run $1B? or even $100M? Who are these investors who trust hedge funds enough to invest their money with them? Aren't they risky?




How many months or years does it take to raise $100M in capital?



So is hedge fund marketing is it very challenging?

Richard The salary of a hedge fund manager can go into billions, based on whose portfolio he's managing. The top hedge fund manager in the United States made around US$ 4 billion in 2009 and some can make up to 1billion a year, so that's the higher end of the hedge fund manager salary spectrum. Of course, not all of them make anywhere around that amount, but hedge fund managers have one of the highest paying jobs. what factors is the hedge fund manager salary is based on; is it commissions performance ....

 
Richard do hedge fund managers often invest their own money ?

 
Managers of hedge funds are usually paid in “carried interest,” a term that describes a manager’s share of profits in certain types of partnerships. Payouts are currently taxed at the 15 percent capital gains rate, but Democrats want the levy to resemble ordinary income rates, which are expected to be more than 39 percent next year , Democrats say the tax increase adds a new level of fairness to the tax code, while Republicans warn its enactment will ruin the economy. ? Is it fair to increase taxes for managers who make 1 million dollars a year especialy whe so many of them are out of business ?

Becoming a hedge fund manager is not easy and you need a pretty good track record if people are to trust you with their wealth. Hedge fund managers generally hold a degree or two in fields like mathematics economics stock market and finanacial mamanagement ... etc.

Hedge funds managers generally have to be from reputed schools in the field, because clients check all of this when they entrust a a hedge fund manager with their money. Secondly, the hedge fund manager has to have a good work experience record. The manager generally starts off small, as an analyst or at a job in a similar company, where he learns his trade and how to work in the stock market. It takes a long experience record and successful investing to become a good hedge fund manager that people give their money to.



So How do you Become a Hedge Fund Manager? If someone wanted to start a hedge fund how do they go about doing so?

There is a notion out there that most Americans would be better off if hedge funds failed. Hedge funds manipulate the stock markets, trade on insider information, and rob 99% Americans,,,Richard what can you say as an arguement against those critics?

Had Wall Street not been bailed out, nearly every hedge fund would have gone out of business Richard? do you share that view?


What do you think the mainstream media is missing when they publish stories on hedge fund managers? What is misunderstood?
How are hedge funds doing this year performance wise? I hear all sorts of things on the news about hedge funds having mediocre at best performance what is going on?

Are there more hedge funds leaving the business or coming to this niche area?

At this point, you are no doubt aware that there are important questions to ask before investing in a hedge fund or a fund of hedge funds. Look before you leap and make sure you do your research. ,,,
what are some of the list of questions to consider when seeking a hedge fund investment richard ?

Who are the founders and the principals? What are their backgrounds and credentials? How long before the founders/principals expect to retire?
How long has the fund been in business? What is the ownership structure? (e.g. Is it a limited liability company? Who are the managing members? Are classes of shares issued?)
What is the fee structure and how are principals/employees compensated?
What is the basic investment strategy (must be more specific than proprietary)?
How often is valuation performed and how often are reports produced for investors (or limited partners)?
What are the liquidity provisions? (e.g. What is the lock-out period?)
How does the fund measure and assess risk (e.g. VaR)? What is the track record in regard to risk?
Who are the references








About Samuel EzerzerSamuel Ezerzer Bsc, Producer & Host of the Money & Business Show ;